Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Improved vascularisation but inefficient in vivo bone regeneration of adipose stem cells and poly-3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate scaffolds in xeno-free conditions.

Paula ACC., Carvalho PH., Martins TMM., Boeloni JN., Cunha PS., Novikoff S.

Animal Study on Face & Skin, published in Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl (2019)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
31761156
DOI
10.1016/j.msec.2019.110301
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

Bone defects are a common clinical situation. However, bone regeneration remains a challenge and faces the limitation of poor engraftment due to deficient vascularisation. Poly-3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate (PHB-HV) and human adipose stem cells (hASC) are promising for vascularisation and bone regeneration. Therefore, we sought to investigate the bone regenerative capacity of hASCs cultured in allogeneic human serum (aHS) and PHB-HV scaffolds in a nude mouse model of the critical-sized calvarial defect. We evaluated bone healing for three treatment groups: empty (control), PHB-HV and PHB-HV + hASCs. The pre-implant analysis showed that hASCs colonised the PHB-HV scaffolds maintaining cell viability before implantation. Histological analysis revealed that PHB-HV scaffolds were tolerated in vivo; they integrated with adjacent tissue eliciting a response like a foreign body reaction, and tiny primary bone was observed only in the PHB-HV group. Also, the μ-CT analysis revealed only approximately 10% of new bone in the bone defect area in both the PHB-HV and PHB-HV + hASCs groups. The expression of BGLAP and its protein (osteocalcin) by PHB-HV + hASCs group and native bone was similar while the other bone markers RUNX2, ALPL and COL1A1 were upregulated, but this expression remained significantly lower compared to the native bone. Nevertheless, the PHB-HV group showed neovas

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsBone SubstitutesBone and BonesCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedHumansMaleMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research