Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsRetrospective StudyPubMed

Improvement of endometrial thickness and in vitro fertilization outcomes in patients with Asherman's refractory endometrium using autologous mesenchymal stem cells from the stromal vascular fraction.

Hernández-Melchor D., Ortiz G., Madrazo I., Suarez JJ., Barrera N., Porchia LM.

Retrospective Study with a reported sample of 41 on Scar, published in Am J Transl Res (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Retrospective Study
Journal
Am J Transl Res (2024)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
41
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39262711
PMCID
PMC11384418
DOI
10.62347/UAGF1249
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

Patients with Asherman's Syndrome (AS) and an endometrial thickness (EMT) less than 7 mm are infertile women with suboptimal endometrium due to uterine scarring or endometrial atrophy. This study aimed to examine the effect of intrauterine injections of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSC) from the Stromal Vascular Fraction (SVF) of adipose tissue on EMT and in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes: which are improvements in EMT and pregnancy rates. This double-arm retrospective study included 41 AS patients with hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. Twenty-one patients with AS refractory endometrium (Group 2) were given ADMSC to improve EMT, and 20 non-treated, age-matched patients served as controls (Group 1). For Group 2, SVF was isolated from 15 ml of adipose tissue and transmyometrial injected into the patient's uterine cavity. For all patients, EMT was examined using ultrasound before embryo transfer. In Group 2, after ADMSC treatment, EMT significantly improved (3.2 ± 1.8 mm, P<0.001). Afterward, three patients spontaneously became pregnant, and eighteen underwent frozen embryo transfer. A significant increase in implantation (66.7% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.002) and live birth rates (0.0% vs. 47.6%, P = 0.001) were recorded. No significant difference was observed in EMT, cycle implantation, or clinical pregnancy between the two groups, but the live birth rate in Group 2 after ADMSC

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research