Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMedOpen access

In-process evaluation of culture errors using morphology-based image analysis.

Imai Y., Yoshida K., Matsumoto M., Okada M., Kanie K., Shimizu K.

Laboratory Study, published in Regen Ther (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Regen Ther (2018)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
30525071
PMCID
PMC6222266
DOI
10.1016/j.reth.2018.06.001
Citations
14

Abstract (original English)

Introduction Advancing industrial-scale manufacture of cells as therapeutic products is an example of the wide applications of regenerative medicine. However, one bottleneck in establishing stable and efficient cell manufacture is quality control. Owing to the lack of effective in-process measurement technology, analyzing the time-consuming and complex cell culture process that essentially determines cellular quality is difficult and only performed by manual microscopic observation. Our group has been applying advanced image-processing and machine-learning modeling techniques to construct prediction models that support quality evaluations during cell culture. In this study, as a model of errors during the cell culture process, intentional errors were compared to the standard culture and analyzed based only on the time-course morphological information of the cells. Methods Twenty-one lots of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), including both bone-marrow-derived MSCs and adipose-derived MSCs, were cultured under 5 conditions (one standard and 4 types of intentional errors, such as clear failure of handlings and machinery malfunctions). Using time-course microscopic images, cell morphological profiles were quantitatively measured and utilized for visualization and prediction modeling. For visualization, modified principal component analysis (PCA) was used. For prediction modeling

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.