Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMed

Inflammatory biomarker in adipose stem cells of women with endometrial cancer.

Linkov F., Goughnour SL., Adambekov S., Lokshin A., Kelley JL., Sukumvanich P.

Clinical Trial with a reported sample of 22, published in Biomark Med (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Biomark Med (2018)
Country
England
Reported sample size
22
Source database
PubMed
PMID
30043637
PMCID
PMC6439519
DOI
10.2217/bmm-2017-0355
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

To explore inflammatory biomarkers secreted by adipose stem cells (ASCs) in omental, retroperitoneal and subcutaneous adipose tissues of women with endometrial cancer. ASCs were collected from 22 women, aged 35-83 years, undergoing hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Angiopoietin-2, EGF, IL-8, leptin, VEGFA, VEGFC and VEFGD levels in the ASC-conditioned media were analyzed by Luminex. We found a significant difference between the three depots for IL-8 (p < 0.0001), with the highest levels of IL-8 in the omental depot. VEGFA levels were highest in the retroperitoneal depot. This is one of the first studies to explore biomarker expression in ASC-conditioned media in adipose tissue. ASC characteristics may be important to evaluate in relation to cancer risk.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCytokinesEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiddle Aged

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.