The Influence of Sedimentation on the Composition of the Lipoaspirate and the Effects on Further Mechanical Processing.
Eigenberger A., Felthaus O., Bartsch A., Schimanski T., Utpatel K., Prantl L.
Laboratory Study, published in Cells (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Cells (2025)
- Country
- Switzerland
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 40277926
- PMCID
- PMC12025502
- DOI
- 10.3390/cells14080601
- Citations
- 1
Abstract (original English)
Manual processing of lipoaspirate can enhance stem cell concentration, thereby improving the take rate, which still represents a major challenge in autologous fat transfer. However, since the preparation consists of many manual steps that are difficult to standardize, we investigated the influence of residual tumescent solution on the macroscopic and microscopic outcome of the mechanically processed lipoaspirate. Additionally, we investigated whether sedimentation followed by vacuum filtration of the aqueous phase could accelerate processing by replacing the initial centrifugation step. Samples with more than 5% remaining aqueous phase show no clearly defined oil phase, preventing any volume reduction. In contrast, all centrifuged samples produced a clear oil phase. The remaining tissue, as confirmed by both histology and viability assays, was superior to nanofat. Although sedimentation and filtration in the LipoCollector did not sufficiently separate enough aqueous phase from the lipoaspirate, tissue viability was significantly higher compared to our control container. Our findings indicate that centrifugation remains essential for effective aqueous phase separation and further mechanical processing, while the automatic filtration may enhance processing efficiency. These results indicate that further work is needed to simplify mechanical processing, as the outcome can be signi
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.