Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

The influence of tissue microenvironment on stem cell-based cartilage repair

Jayasuriya CT., Chen Y., Liu W., Chen Q.

Narrative Review on Cartilage Damage, published in Ann N Y Acad Sci (2016) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Ann N Y Acad Sci (2016)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
27464254
PMCID
PMC5599120
DOI
10.1111/nyas.13170
Citations
38

Abstract (original English)

Mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells and induced pluripotent stem cells have become viable cell sources for prospective cell-based cartilage engineering and tissue repair. The development and function of stem cells are influenced by the tissue microenvironment. Specifically, the local tissue microenvironment can dictate how stem cells integrate into the existing tissue matrix and how successfully they can restore function to the damaged area in question. This review focuses on the microenvironmental features of articular cartilage and how they influence stem cell-based cartilage tissue repair. Also discussed are current tissue-engineering strategies used in combination with cell-based therapies, all of which are designed to mimic the natural properties of cartilage tissue in order to achieve a better healing response.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Cartilage, ArticularChondrocytesMesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsHumansTissue EngineeringInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsCellular Microenvironment

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research