Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMed

Inhibition of adipocyte differentiation by HIV protease inhibitors.

Zhang B., MacNaul K., Szalkowski D., Li Z., Berger J., Moller DE.

Prospective Study on Type 2 Diabetes, published in J Clin Endocrinol Metab (1999) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
J Clin Endocrinol Metab (1999)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
10566684
DOI
10.1210/jcem.84.11.6234

Abstract (original English)

Patients with AIDS who are receiving therapy with HIV protease inhibitors have been widely reported to be afflicted with a syndrome characterized by lipodystrophy (fat redistribution favoring the accumulation of abdominal and cervical adipose tissue), hyperlipidemia, and insulin resistance. HIV protease inhibitors have been suggested to have a direct role in modulating adipocyte differentiation. To address this hypothesis, several HIV protease inhibitors were studied for their ability to either augment or inhibit the differentiation of murine 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Dose-responsive inhibition of adipogenesis by several protease inhibitors was noted as measured by reduced triglyceride accumulation and attenuated induction of three differentiation marker genes -- aP2, lipoprotein lipase, and Adipo Q. Potential mechanisms for altered adipocyte function, including direct binding to PPARgamma or inhibition of PPARgamma-mediated gene transcription were effectively excluded.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
3T3 CellsAdipocytesAdiponectinAnimalsCarbamatesCarrier ProteinsCell DifferentiationDose-Response Relationship, DrugFatty Acid-Binding Protein 7Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research