Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Inhibition of gamma-secretases alters both proliferation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.

Vujovic S., Henderson SR., Flanagan AM., Clements MO.

Laboratory Study, published in Cell Prolif (2007) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Cell Prolif (2007)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
17472726
DOI
10.1111/j.1365-2184.2007.00426.x

Abstract (original English)

Human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC) proliferation and development is regulated by many signalling pathways. gamma-Secretases play an important role in Notch signalling as well as other processes that are involved in developmental decisions, but their role in hMSC proliferation and cell fate decisions has not been explored. To investigate the role of gamma-secretases in hMSC proliferation and differentiation. Using the gamma-secretase inhibitor N-[N-(3,5-Difluorophenacetyl-L-alanyl]-S-phenylglycine t-butyl ester (DAPT), we investigated their role in hMSC growth and differentiation to chondrogenic, osteogenic and adipogenic fates. We found that inhibiting gamma-secretases reduced the rate of hMSC proliferation, and altered hMSC differentiation in vitro. Addition of DAPT had an inhibitory effect on chondrogenesis resulting in impaired cartilage matrix production and altered chondrocyte morphology. DAPT treated chrodrocytic pellets had reduced levels of Hes1 and Hey1 suggesting that these effects are mediated via Notch signalling. Addition of the DAPT inhibitor to osteogenic cultures did not alter the appearance of bone markers, however, adipogenesis occurred in these cultures in a DAPT concentration-dependent manner. DAPT did not enhance adipogenesis in the presence of a potent adipogenic cocktail, but had an adipogenic effect when combined with dexamethasone only. We conclude that

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AdipocytesAdipogenesisAdultAmyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationChondrogenesisDexamethasoneDipeptides

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.