Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

From injury to integrity: tissue engineering solutions in combined bone repair and regeneration and muscle repair

Jin Y., Huang Y., Wang J., Zhou X., Chen J., Ding W.

Narrative Review on Scar, published in Burns Trauma (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Burns Trauma (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40979903
PMCID
PMC12449194
DOI
10.1093/burnst/tkaf052
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

The musculoskeletal system is essential for human movement. However, the increasing incidence of complex musculoskeletal injuries, which involve substantial loss of soft (muscle, skin) and hard (bone) tissues poses significant clinical challenges. Autogenous and allogeneic bone grafts are the most commonly adopted surgical methods for severe bone defects. However, severe postoperative complications, such as immune rejection and donor site necrosis, can lead to poor prognosis. Additionally, the scarcity of bone graft sources limits their application. Moreover, soft tissue injuries are often inadequately addressed in orthopedic procedures, leading to impaired muscle function and highlighting the urgent need for new strategies in integrated musculoskeletal repair. This review explores tissue engineering solutions by examining the interplay between muscle and bone physiology, elucidating their regenerative mechanisms, and evaluating innovations such as hydrogels, electrospun fibers, and conductive scaffolds for tissue repair. We advocate for integrated strategies that target the simultaneous restoration of soft and hard tissues to improve clinical outcomes.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research