Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Integrating Machine Learning into Additive Manufacturing of Metallic Biomaterials: A Comprehensive Review

Zhao S., Shi Y., Huang C., Li X., Lu Y., Wu Y.

Narrative Review, published in J Funct Biomater (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Funct Biomater (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40137356
PMCID
PMC11942666
DOI
10.3390/jfb16030077

Abstract (original English)

The global increase in osteomuscular diseases, particularly bone defects and fractures, has driven the growing demand for metallic implants. Additive manufacturing (AM) has emerged as a transformative technology for producing high-precision metallic biomaterials with customized properties, offering significant advantages over traditional manufacturing methods. The integration of machine learning (ML) with AM has shown great promise in optimizing the fabrication process, enhancing material performance, and predicting long-term behavior, particularly in the development of orthopedic implants and vascular stents. This review explores the application of ML in AM of metallic biomaterials, focusing on four key areas: (1) component design, where ML guides the optimization of multi-component alloys for improved mechanical and biological properties; (2) structural design, enabling the creation of intricate porous architectures tailored to specific functional requirements; (3) process control, facilitating real-time monitoring and adjustment of manufacturing parameters; and (4) parameter optimization, which reduces costs and enhances production efficiency. This review offers a comprehensive overview of four key aspects, presenting relevant research and providing an in-depth analysis of the current state of ML-guided AM techniques for metallic biomaterials. It enables readers to gain a th

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.