Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMedOpen access

Interplay of matrix stiffness and protein tethering in stem cell differentiation.

Wen JH., Vincent LG., Fuhrmann A., Choi YS., Hribar KC., Taylor-Weiner H.

Laboratory Study on Face & Skin, published in Nat Mater (2014) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Nat Mater (2014)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
25108614
PMCID
PMC4172528
DOI
10.1038/nmat4051
Citations
696

Abstract (original English)

Stem cells regulate their fate by binding to, and contracting against, the extracellular matrix. Recently, it has been proposed that in addition to matrix stiffness and ligand type, the degree of coupling of fibrous protein to the surface of the underlying substrate, that is, tethering and matrix porosity, also regulates stem cell differentiation. By modulating substrate porosity without altering stiffness in polyacrylamide gels, we show that varying substrate porosity did not significantly change protein tethering, substrate deformations, or the osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stromal cells and marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. Varying protein-substrate linker density up to 50-fold changed tethering, but did not affect osteogenesis, adipogenesis, surface-protein unfolding or underlying substrate deformations. Differentiation was also unaffected by the absence of protein tethering. Our findings imply that the stiffness of planar matrices regulates stem cell differentiation independently of protein tethering and porosity.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AdipogenesisBiocompatible MaterialsBiomechanical PhenomenaBiophysical PhenomenaCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationCell MovementCells, CulturedDimethylpolysiloxanesElastic Modulus

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research