Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceSystematic Review

Interventions used to mitigate muscle fatty degeneration following the repair of massive rotator cuff tears. A systematic review of animal studies.

Stamiris D., Valasidis A., Cheva A., Papavasiliou K., Stamiris S., Potoupnis M.

Systematic Review on Rotator Cuff, published in Orthop Traumatol Surg Res (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Systematic Review
Journal
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res (2024)
Country
France
Reported sample size
PMID
37879533
DOI
10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103723

Abstract (original English)

Muscle fatty degeneration following rotator cuff tears has been unequivocally associated with poorer functional outcomes and increased risk for retear following rotator cuff repair. Promising results have emerged from animal studies, with the implementation of various interventions for biologic inhibition of this fatty muscle degeneration. The lack of high quality randomized human evidence on this topic, increases the impact of pooled results from animal literature. The aim of the present study was to systematically review the available published literature for animal studies evaluating the ability of several interventions used to mitigate muscle fatty degeneration following the repair of massive rotator cuff tears. A comprehensive search was conducted on Pubmed, Scopus and Google Scholar, covering the period from conception until 16th April 2022. Datasets were stratified based on the type of intervention performed. SYRCLE risk of bias instrument was implemented for quality assessment of the included studies. Rotator cuff repair augmentation with Adipose derived stem cells (ADSC's), Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC's) and Nandrolone was effective against fatty infiltration, but less effective against muscle atrophy. More beneficial effect was shown by the utilization of Beige adipose tissue - Fibroadipogenic progenitors (BAT-FAP) stimulation, using either Amibregon or BAT-FAPs trans

What this study does not prove

  • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsAdipose TissueMuscular AtrophyNandroloneRotator CuffRotator Cuff Injuries

Related research