Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMedOpen access

Intra-articular treatments for hindfoot osteoarthritis.

Gomes FF., de Castro Junior IM., Matheus Guimaraes JA., Rosa IM., de Sousa EB., Cordeiro A.

Prospective Study on Osteoarthritis, Ankle Injury, published in World J Orthop (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
World J Orthop (2025)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
40979146
PMCID
PMC12444287
DOI
10.5312/wjo.v16.i9.109147

Abstract (original English)

Hindfoot osteoarthritis (HFOA) leads to pain, impaired function, and reduced quality of life. Conservative management aims to alleviate symptoms and delay surgical interventions such as arthrodesis, particularly in young patients with post-traumatic HFOA. Intra-articular injections of corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid are widely used as alternatives for treating foot and ankle osteoarthritis to provide temporary pain relief and functional improvement. Recently, orthobiologic treatments have gained interest for their potential regenerative effects. This review aims to summarize the current evidence on intra-articular injections for HFOA, highlighting the potential benefits, perspectives, and mechanisms of action of conventional and orthobiologic treatments such as platelet-rich plasma, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, and adipose-derived stem cells.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research