Intramuscular Adipose Tissue Content Predicts Patient Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.
Hamada R., Asano T., Murao M., Miyasaka J., Matsushita M., Kajimoto T.
Retrospective Study, published in Transplant Cell Ther (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Retrospective Study
- Journal
- Transplant Cell Ther (2022)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 35732268
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.06.011
Abstract (original English)
During clinical courses involving treatment with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), multidisciplinary patient assessment including physical function is indispensable, and quantitative skeletal muscle loss is a poor prognostic marker. Deteriorating quality of muscle from intramuscular adipose tissue degeneration can be important as well, because many patients are cachexic or sarcopenic before allo-HSCT, although this approach has not yet been used in such patients. We conducted this retrospective cohort study to evaluate the quality as well as quantity of skeletal muscle using computed tomography (CT) scans. The psoas muscle mass index (PMI) and radiographic density (RD) calculated by cross-sectional area and averaged CT values of the psoas major muscle at the umbilical level were used to determine the quantity and quality of muscle, respectively. A total of 186 adult patients, ranging in age from 17 to 68 years (median, 49 years), were included in this study, with 46 (24.7%) assigned to the lower PMI group and 49 (26.3%) assigned to the lower RD group. Low RD was identified as an independent risk factor for poor overall survival after allo-HSCT (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.54; P < .01), whereas PMI was not significant. Decreased RD along with a reduced 6-min walking distance before transplantation were significant factors in increased nonrelapse m
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.
Evidence level
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.