Intraperitoneal metastasis of ovarian cancer: new insights on resident macrophages in the peritoneal cavity
Miyamoto T., Murphy B., Zhang N.
Narrative Review, published in Front Immunol (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Front Immunol (2023)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 37180125
- PMCID
- PMC10167029
- DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1104694
- Citations
- 26
Abstract (original English)
Ovarian cancer metastasis occurs primarily in the peritoneal cavity. Orchestration of cancer cells with various cell types, particularly macrophages, in the peritoneal cavity creates a metastasis-favorable environment. In the past decade, macrophage heterogeneities in different organs as well as their diverse roles in tumor settings have been an emerging field. This review highlights the unique microenvironment of the peritoneal cavity, consisting of the peritoneal fluid, peritoneum, and omentum, as well as their own resident macrophage populations. Contributions of resident macrophages in ovarian cancer metastasis are summarized; potential therapeutic strategies by targeting such cells are discussed. A better understanding of the immunological microenvironment in the peritoneal cavity will provide a stepping-stone to new strategies for developing macrophage-based therapies and is a key step toward the unattainable eradication of intraperitoneal metastasis of ovarian cancer.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.