Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Intrathecal Injection of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem-Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Spinal Cord Injury: A Feasibility Study in Pigs

Shulman I., Ageeva T., Kostennikov A., Ogurcov S., Tazetdinova L., Kabdesh I.

Animal Study on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Int J Mol Sci (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Int J Mol Sci (2023)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
37175946
PMCID
PMC10179045
DOI
10.3390/ijms24098240
Citations
12

Abstract (original English)

Spinal cord injury (SCI) remains one of the current medical and social problems, as it causes deep disability in patients. The use of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) is one strategy for stimulating the post-traumatic recovery of the structure and function of the spinal cord. Here, we chose an optimal method for obtaining cytochalasin B-induced EVs, including steps with active vortex mixing for 60 s and subsequent filtration to remove nuclei and disorganized inclusions. The therapeutic potential of repeated intrathecal injection of autologous MSC-derived EVs in the subacute period of pig contused SCI was also evaluated for the first time. In this study, we observed the partial restoration of locomotor activity by stimulating the remyelination of axons and timely reperfusion of nervous tissue.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Spinal CordMesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsSwineSpinal Cord InjuriesInjections, SpinalFeasibility StudiesExtracellular Vesicles

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research