Intravesical injection of peripheral blood mononuclear cell for the treatment of interstitial cystitis: A preliminary report
Tsai CP., Cheng KL., Yang E., Huang LY., Wang FH., Hung MJ.
Clinical Trial, published in PLoS One (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Clinical Trial
- Journal
- PLoS One (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 40397968
- PMCID
- PMC12094792
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0324535
Abstract (original English)
Interstitial cystitis (IC) is a complex syndrome characterized by symptoms such as bladder pain, urgency, frequency, and nocturia, without the presence of urinary tract infection or any other identifiable pathology. Traditional treatments, including medication and bladder instillation, are often ineffective in about 30% of patients. Currently, efforts are focused on developing therapies based on the possible pathogenesis of IC. This study is a phase one clinical trial which aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) intravesical injections, which have the potential to promote tissue regeneration, as a novel treatment for IC. The study involved isolating PBMCs using the Sepax Cell Separation System and injecting these cells beneath the bladder mucosa layer of patients with IC. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using voiding diaries, questionnaires, and cystoscopic examinations before and 3 months after treatment. Twelve patients with refractory IC participated in this study. Observed side effects, such as pain or urinary tract infection, were mild and transient which demonstrated the safety of this treatment modality. Although the treatment response varied among patients, a third of the patients experienced moderate to significant progress according to the GRA score. Four patients exhibited improvement in bladder glomerulati
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.