Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialEurope PMCOpen access

Is Graphene Shortening the Path toward Spinal Cord Regeneration?

Girão AF., Serrano MC., Completo A., Marques PAAP.

Clinical Trial on Spinal Cord Injury, published in ACS Nano (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
ACS Nano (2022)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
36000717
PMCID
PMC9776589
DOI
10.1021/acsnano.2c04756
Citations
29

Abstract (original English)

Along with the development of the next generation of biomedical platforms, the inclusion of graphene-based materials (GBMs) into therapeutics for spinal cord injury (SCI) has potential to nourish topmost neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies for enhancing neural structural and physiological recovery. In the context of SCI, contemplated as one of the most convoluted challenges of modern medicine, this review first provides an overview of its characteristics and pathophysiological features. Then, the most relevant ongoing clinical trials targeting SCI, including pharmaceutical, robotics/neuromodulation, and scaffolding approaches, are introduced and discussed in sequence with the most important insights brought by GBMs into each particular topic. The current role of these nanomaterials on restoring the spinal cord microenvironment after injury is critically contextualized, while proposing future concepts and desirable outputs for graphene-based technologies aiming to reach clinical significance for SCI.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
Spinal CordHumansSpinal Cord InjuriesGraphitePharmaceutical PreparationsSpinal Cord Regeneration

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research