Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMed

Is post-transplant metabolic syndrome associated with pre-liver transplant visceral adipose tissue area?

Woodward AJ., Wallen MP., Ryan J., Hall A., Ward LC., Coombes JS.

Prospective Study, published in Clin Nutr ESPEN (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Clin Nutr ESPEN (2020)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
32859330
DOI
10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.07.018

Abstract (original English)

Post-liver transplant metabolic syndrome (PTMS) is a significant independent risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease. The impact of pre-transplant body composition on the risk of developing PTMS has not been evaluated and was the aim of this study. Seventy-five consecutive adult patients listed for liver transplant were included in the analysis. Anthropometric and metabolic data were collected pre-transplant and at three months post-transplant. Metabolic syndrome was defined in accordance with international guidelines. Skeletal muscle area (SMA), visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) areas were derived from computed tomography. Ten patients (13%) developed de novo PTMS by 3 months post-transplant. Patients who developed PTMS had higher pre-transplant body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.01), VAT (P = 0.001) and SAT (P = 0.008). Univariate logistic regression found that BMI, VAT and SAT were significant predictors for the development of PTMS. After stepwise multivariate analysis, only VAT remained a significant predictor (OR 1.02, 95%CI 1.01-1.04; P = 0.04). Higher pre-transplant VAT is independently associated with the development of metabolic syndrome three months post-transplant. Body composition analysis using cross-sectional imaging prior to liver transplant can assist with identifying patients at greatest risk for developing PTMS.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
AdultHumansIntra-Abdominal FatLiver TransplantationMetabolic SyndromeRisk FactorsSubcutaneous Fat

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.