Isolation, expansion and characterisation of mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow, adipose tissue, umbilical cord blood and matrix: a comparative study.
Secunda R., Vennila R., Mohanashankar AM., Rajasundari M., Jeswanth S., Surendran R.
Laboratory Study, published in Cytotechnology (2014) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Cytotechnology (2014)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 24798808
- PMCID
- PMC4545441
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10616-014-9718-z
- Citations
- 151
Abstract (original English)
The multipotent and immunosuppressive capacities of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) attract several scientists worldwide towards translational research focusing on treatment of diseases including liver failure. Though MSC's have been isolated from different sources, researchers do not concur on the best source for expansion and clinical translation. In this study, we have compared the isolation, proliferation and expansion of MSCs from umbilical cord blood (UCB), Wharton's Jelly (WJ), bone marrow (BM) and adipose tissue (AT). MSCs were isolated by density gradient separation from UCB, BM and AT and by both enzymatic and explant method for WJ. The MSCs are characterized by their ability to adhere to plastic, expression of positive (CD105, CD73, CD90, CD29, CD44) and negative (CD45, CD14, CD34) markers by flow cytometry and also by their in vitro adipogenic, osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation. This comprehensive study clearly shows that WJ is better than UCB both in terms of rapidity, yield and ease of procedure. AT and BM are autologous sources for MSC's but the specimen collection involves cumbersome and painful procedures and an invasive approach. However being autologous, they are safe and probable candidates for therapeutic future applications.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.