Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

The Japan Society of Coloproctology Practice Guidelines for Fecal Incontinence 2024 (Revised Second Edition)

Koda K., Mimura T., Yamana T., Ishizuka M., Takahashi T., Takano S.

Narrative Review on Back & Spine, published in J Anus Rectum Colon (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Anus Rectum Colon (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41623601
PMCID
PMC12854284
DOI
10.23922/jarc.2025-042

Abstract (original English)

In 2024, the second edition of the Japan Society of Coloproctology (JSCP) Practice Guidelines for Fecal Incontinence was published in Japan, followed by the release of this English version. This marks the first major revision in 7 years since the publication of the first edition. The second edition was completed over a span of 3 years, and its overview and key features are summarized below. This guideline begins with a clinical flowchart outlining the general diagnostic and therapeutic approach. A notable update is the inclusion of insertable anal and vaginal continence devices, which are now considered a form of conservative therapy under clinical research frameworks. In Chapter I-B (Epidemiology), the prevalence of anal incontinence was newly reported: among a Japanese population with an average age of 35 years, 15.5% of men and 42.7% of women were affected. In Chapter II (Diagnosis), the utility of a bowel diary for patient assessment is discussed for the first time. The guideline also provides a detailed description of the evaluation method for digital rectal examination. Additionally, a new section was added addressing incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD), including its risks and methods of assessment. In Chapter III (Diagnostic Testing), the guideline expands upon previously established diagnostic tests by newly including detailed descriptions of ultrasound techniques

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research