Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsCase Report / SeriesPubMed

Large retroperitoneal mass: A case of an undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma.

Chen MJ., Makehei S., Chen I., De Michele S., Bhanu S., Wei J.

Case Report / Series, published in Radiol Case Rep (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Case Report / Series
Journal
Radiol Case Rep (2025)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39897756
DOI
10.1016/j.radcr.2024.09.141

Abstract (original English)

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a group of rare malignant tumors arising from mesenchymal stem cells. There are more than 60 different types of neoplasms that fall under the umbrella of STS, including tumors that originate from cartilage, adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, or connective tissue, among many other tissue types. One particular type of high-grade aggressive STS is the undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), formerly known as the malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH). There has historically been much debate about the classification and differentiation of UPS from other types of sarcomas, which has only recently been characterized by novel methods of immunohistochemistry markers and sophisticated cytogenetics. This has left much of the literature regarding UPS largely irrelevant in context of our current classification standards. A recent retrospective analysis of 100 UPS cases revealed an incidence of only 9% for UPS originating in the retroperitoneum. We present a case of UPS originating in the retroperitoneum. In this case, a patient suffering from a large right-sided intra-abdominal mass underwent complete surgical resection. We also demonstrate some of the complexities involved in the diagnosis and treatment of a rare retroperitoneal form of UPS.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.