Laser Doppler imaging evaluation of adipogenesis after adipose tissue-derived stem cell implantation.
Ito R., Morimoto N., Suzuki S.
Animal Study, published in J Artif Organs (2013) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- J Artif Organs (2013)
- Country
- Japan
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 23793976
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10047-013-0718-0
Abstract (original English)
We need a better method of assessing adipose tissue formation non-invasively than the current one, which requires resecting tissue samples in vivo. The aim of this study was to establish a system to evaluate adipogenesis using laser Doppler imaging (LDI) to measure subcutaneous microcirculation. CGSs containing adipose stem cells with or without bFGF were implanted in the backs of 30 mice. Once per week after implantation, LDI was used to evaluate blood flow at the implantation site. The implantation sites were resected at 6 weeks, and the tissue was weighed. Six weeks after implantation, LDI showed that mice who received CGS with 1 μg/cm(2) bFGF had the greatest mean blood flow, and these mice had the heaviest resected specimens, which contained the most newly formed adipose tissue. The findings for LDI and the weight findings were compatible. This study indicates that LDI could be used to assess subcutaneous tissue regeneration in vivo in a real-time, non-invasive manner.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.