Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsCase Report / SeriesEurope PMCOpen access

Laser therapy as a treatment for chronic radiation fibrosis

Wilson B., Shah R., Menzer C., Aleisa A., Rossi A.

Case Report / Series, published in Lasers Surg Med (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Case Report / Series
Journal
Lasers Surg Med (2023)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
36349748
PMCID
PMC10099494
DOI
10.1002/lsm.23617
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

Background Chronic radiation fibrosis (CRF) is a long-term sequala of radiation therapy that has a significant impact on patient quality of life. There is no standard of care or single therapeutic modality that has been found to be consistently effective. Objective To describe our experience using fractional 10,600 nm carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) laser therapy and vascular laser therapy in a series of patients with CRF. Methods Patients presenting to the dermatology service for CRF were evaluated for laser therapy eligibility. Patients were eligible if they had a clinical diagnosis of CRF confirmed by physical examination. Results We identified five patients with CRF treated with fractional ablative CO 2 laser and vascular laser. Patients were a median age of 57 years old, and the amount of time between the initiation of radiotherapy and laser treatment ranged between 3 months and 40 years. The satisfactory response was achieved in all cases. Limitations Lack of standardized laser protocol, small sample size, lack of a control group, different anatomical locations CONCLUSION: Fractional ablative and vascular laser therapy may serve as an additional treatment for CRF, leading to functional improvements.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
HumansCarbon DioxideTreatment OutcomeQuality of LifeMiddle AgedLaser TherapyLasers, GasRadiation Fibrosis Syndrome

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.