LCST/UCST behavior of polysaccharides for hydrogel fabrication
Moon SH., Park SJ., Lee YW., Yang YJ.
Narrative Review, published in RSC Adv (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- RSC Adv (2024)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 39529738
- PMCID
- PMC11551713
- DOI
- 10.1039/d4ra06240j
- Citations
- 21
Abstract (original English)
Hydrogel-based scaffolds play a crucial role in widespread biotechnological applications by providing physicochemical stability to loaded cells or therapeutic agents, interacting with organismal microenvironments, and controlling cargo release. Polysaccharides are regarded as attractive candidates among substrate materials because of their high water-retaining capacity, reactive functional groups, ease of gelation, low immunogenicity, biodegradability, and biocompatibility. However, employing polysaccharide-based hydrogel scaffolds for practical use in response to ongoing physiological and pathological changes within the human body, such as insufficient mechanical strength, uncertain degradation, and uncontrollable release patterns, is challenging. Several physically noncovalent or chemically covalent crosslinking strategies have been utilized to modify the physicochemical properties and biofunctionality of polysaccharide-based hydrogels. Among them, thermo-responsive gelation systems have been considered a promising approach for fabricating advanced scaffolds, referred to as 'stimuli-responsive' or 'smart' hydrogels. This is because of the sol-gel transition with a single trigger, requiring no further environmental or chemical intervention, and in situ and reversible gelation under ambient physiological temperature changes in a minimally invasive manner. This review highlights
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.