Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMed

Lipoaugmentation of the vocal folds: a survey on alternative donor sites for graft harvesting.

Prodinger PM., Windisch G., Hammer GP., Anderhuber F., Friedrich G.

Prospective Study on Knee, published in J Voice (2008) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
J Voice (2008)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
18479890
DOI
10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.01.015

Abstract (original English)

Lipoaugmentation is a treatment option for patients suffering from glottic insufficiency. Autologous fat is a nearly ideal material for vocal-fold augmentation from the view of biocompatibility and viscoelasticity, but there is still the problem of high graft resorption. As distribution and biological behavior of fatty tissue is very different in the human body, the aim of the study was to elucidate possible donor sites with respect to the quantity of harvested fat, the surgical accessibility to the region, the donor site morbidity and possibility of aesthetic defects and the quality of harvested tissue. Possible donor sites for harvesting were examined by magnetic resonance imaging in thirty-five patients with special emphasis to the buccal fat pad, the neck, the dorsolateral side of the proximal upper extremity, the subcutaneous layer of the abdominal wall, the superficial trochanteric region, the medial thigh, and the infrapatellar fat pad. Identified regions that failed to be chosen into consideration because of an elaborate surgical approach (superficial axillary's space, ischio-anal fossa, subcutaneous layer of buttock, popliteal fossa) were not taken into consideration. The mean volume of the buccal fat was 3.994 cm(3); the average thickness of the fat at the level of C7 was 1.721 cm, the mean value in the upper extremities was 1.913 cm laterally and 1.275 cm dorsally. T

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
Adipose Tissue, WhiteAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLaryngeal DiseasesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMale

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research