Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Lipofilling after total parotidectomy: a useful option to prevent functional and aesthetic sequelae

Crosetti E., Arrigoni G., Fantini M., Fondello G., Moniaci D., Carnino R.

Prospective Study with a reported sample of 15 on Scar, published in Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital (2022)
Reported sample size
15
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
36654517
PMCID
PMC9853102
DOI
10.14639/0392-100x-n2231

Abstract (original English)

Objective Parotidectomy is the main treatment for parotid tumours, but its functional and aesthetic sequelae can be very disturbing for patients. Methods 15 patients underwent total conservative parotidectomy, harvesting of a superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) flap and lipofilling between May 2014 and June 2020 for a benign parotid tumour. Aesthetic, functional sequelae and cosmetic results were assessed with the House-Brackmann scale, Luna-Ortiz's classification and a semiquantitative questionnaire. Lipofilling resorption was analysed by maxillofacial and neck MRI imaging at 2 years after surgery. The results were compared to a group of 21 patients who underwent total parotidectomy without harvesting a SMAS flap and lipofilling. Results No complications were observed. No facial defects were seen during follow-up. Post-operative MRI showed fat resorption was less than 20% in 12 patients and from 20 to 30% in 3 patients. Cosmetic satisfaction was 100% in all cases. Only 1 patient (6%) complained of Frey's syndrome. Conclusions Lipofilling is an excellent solution considering its efficacy, safety, simplicity, duration over time and economic costs. Donor site invasiveness is minimal, and reintervention is always possible. Face-lift incision and SMAS flap can improve aesthetic results and minimise the disfiguring impact of the surgical scar.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
Parotid GlandSurgical FlapsHumansParotid NeoplasmsSweating, GustatoryPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesEsthetics

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research