[Liposuction].
Pallua N., Wolter T.
Narrative Review, published in Chirurg (2011) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Chirurg (2011)
- Country
- Germany
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 21826569
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00104-011-2106-8
- Citations
- 2
Abstract (original English)
Liposuction is one of the most commonly performed procedures in aesthetic surgery. The primary aim is body contouring and not weight reduction. The vast amount of available methods for suctioning subcutaneous fat allows an optimal individual treatment plan, keeping in mind the correct indications. Although liposuction is often offered as a minor and harmless surgery, it is a complex procedure. A thorough training of the surgeon and in-depth knowledge about possible complications is essential. In addition to aesthetic indications liposuction is also a valuable tool in reconstructive surgery. For optimal patient selection the skin elasticity has to be considered during the preoperative assessment. Besides pure volume reduction through liposuction, the regenerative possibilities of adipose tissue are of great interest for basic research and clinical applications. Lipofilling or autologous fat transfer is used for a wide variety of aesthetic and reconstructive procedures. Of special interest is the regenerative and reconstructive potential of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC).
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.