Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMedOpen access

A Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Report on Intravitreal Delivery of Adipose Stem Cells and Secretome on Visual Deficits After Traumatic Brain Injury.

Rasiah PK., Jha KA., Gentry J., Del Mar NA., Townsend T., Torgbe KE.

Animal Study, published in Transl Vis Sci Technol (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Transl Vis Sci Technol (2022)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
36180031
PMCID
PMC9547363
DOI
10.1167/tvst.11.10.1
Citations
9

Abstract (original English)

Purpose We compared intravitreal injection of human adipose stem cell concentrated conditioned media (ASC-CCM) to injection of live ASCs for their long-term safety and effectiveness against the visual deficits of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Methods We first tested different intravitreal ASC doses for safety. Other C57BL/6 mice then received focal cranial blast mTBI and were injected with the safe ASC dose (1000 cells/eye), ASC-CCM (∼200 ng protein/eye), or saline solution. At five and 10 months after blast injury, visual, molecular, and histological assessments evaluated treatment efficacy. Histological evaluation of eyes and other organs at 10 months after blast injury assessed safety. Results Human ASCs at 1000 cells/eye were found to be safe, with >10,000 cells causing retinal damage. Blast-injured mice showed significant vision deficits compared to sham blast mice up to 10 months. Blast mice receiving ASC or ASC-CCM showed improved vision at five months but marginal effects at 10 months, correlated with changes in glial fibrillary acidic protein and proinflammatory gene expression in retina. Immunostaining for human IgG failed to detect ASCs in retina. Peripheral organs examined histologically at 10 months after blast injury were normal. Conclusions Intravitreal injection of ASCs or ASC-CCM is safe and effective against the visual deficits of mTBI. Considering the u

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsBlast InjuriesBrain ConcussionBrain Injuries, TraumaticCulture Media, ConditionedGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHumansImmunoglobulin GMiceMice, Inbred C57BL

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.