Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyEurope PMC

Loss of CCR5 results in glucose intolerance in diet-induced obese mice

Kennedy A., Webb CD., Hill AA., Gruen ML., Jackson LG., Hasty AH.

Animal Study on Type 2 Diabetes, published in Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab (2013) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab (2013)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
23941876
PMCID
PMC3798705
DOI
10.1152/ajpendo.00177.2013
Citations
21

Abstract (original English)

Macrophage and T cell infiltration into metabolic tissues contributes to obesity-associated inflammation and insulin resistance (IR). C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5), expressed on macrophages and T cells, plays a critical role in the recruitment and activation of proinflammatory M1 and TH1 immune cells to tissues and is elevated in adipose tissue (AT) and liver of obese humans and mice. Thus, we hypothesized that deficiency of CCR5 would protect against diet-induced inflammation and IR. CCR5-deficient (CCR5(-/-)) mice and C57BL/6 (WT) controls were fed 10% low-fat (LF) or 60% high-fat (HF) diets for 16 wk. HF feeding increased adiposity, blood glucose, and plasma insulin levels equally in both genotypes. Opposing our hypothesis, HF-fed CCR5(-/-) mice were significantly more glucose intolerant than WT mice. In AT, there was a significant reduction in the M1-associated gene CD11c, whereas M2 associated genes were not different between genotypes. In addition, HF feeding caused a twofold increase in CD4(+) T cells in the AT of CCR5(-/-) compared with WT mice. In liver and muscle, no differences in immune cell infiltration or inflammatory cytokine expression were detected. However, in AT and muscle, there was a mild reduction in insulin-induced phosphorylation of AKT and IRβ in CCR5(-/-) compared with WT mice. These findings suggest that whereas CCR5 plays a minor role in regulating

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Muscle, SkeletalAdipose TissueMacrophagesAnimalsMice, KnockoutMiceMice, ObeseGlucose IntoleranceInsulin ResistanceInflammation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research