Low subcutaneous adipose tissue and myosteatosis are prognostic factors after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Barajas Ordonez F., Zeller Y., Wolleschak D., Hinnerichs M., Rodríguez-Feria P., Mougiakakos D.
Retrospective Study, published in Clin Nutr ESPEN (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Retrospective Study
- Journal
- Clin Nutr ESPEN (2024)
- Country
- England
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 38777443
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.03.032
Abstract (original English)
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) represents the only curative treatment option for several hematological neoplasms. This study aimed to assess the parameters of body composition as predictors of post-transplant overall survival (OS) and adverse events in patients with leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). This was a retrospective study of 122 adult patients who underwent their first allo-HSCT. The CT-based semi-automated measurement of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratio (VSR), sarcopenia in terms of skeletal muscle index (SMI), and myosteatosis based on the skeletal muscle radiation attenuation (SM-RA) was performed. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the association of body composition parameters with OS. In the univariate analysis, low SAT and myosteatosis were associated with lower OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-3.51, p = 0.01) and (HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.48-4.25, p =< 0.001), respectively. This association remained significant after adjusting for relevant covariates, with HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.23-4.38, p = 0.01 and HR 2.86, 95% CI 1.51-5.43, p =< 0.001, respectively. On the contrary, VAT, VSR, sarcopenia, and sarcopenic obesity were not statistically significant in OS. Severe post-transplant adverse events
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.
Evidence level
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.