Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Macrophage polarization: molecular mechanisms, disease implications, and targeted therapeutic strategies

Ji Y., Li X., Yao X., Sun J., Yi J., Shen Y.

Narrative Review on Chronic Inflammation, published in Front Immunol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Front Immunol (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41459510
PMCID
PMC12740920
DOI
10.3389/fimmu.2025.1732718
Citations
19

Abstract (original English)

Macrophage polarization represents a fundamental plasticity process within innate immunity, profoundly influencing tissue homeostasis and disease progression. Based on developmental origins, macrophages are categorized into tissue-resident macrophages and monocyte-derived macrophages, which collectively form a dynamic host defense network. Notably, the functional states of macrophages exist along a continuum, extending beyond the classical pro-inflammatory (M1) and anti-inflammatory/reparative (M2) dichotomy. These states are dynamically shaped by spatiotemporally heterogeneous microenvironmental signals and coordinated through intricate molecular networks. Key signaling pathways guide polarization directions. Metabolic reprogramming, where M1 polarization relies on glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway while M2 polarization favors oxidative phosphorylation and fatty acid oxidation, not only supplies energy but also generates regulatory metabolites. Furthermore, epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs, contribute to stabilizing polarized phenotypes. These mechanisms are interconnected, forming feedback loops that collectively sculpt macrophage functional diversity. Dysregulated polarization underlies numerous diseases. In response, therapeutic strategies targeting macrophage polarization are rapidly emerging. These inc

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
MacrophagesAnimalsHumansSignal TransductionCell PolarityMacrophage ActivationEpigenesis, Genetic

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research