Magnetized Cell-Scaffold Constructs for Bone Tissue Engineering: Advances in Fabrication and Magnetic Stimulation
Cinar SanSegundo E., Mirzaali MJ., Fratila-Apachitei LE., Zadpoor AA.
Narrative Review, published in Adv Sci (Weinh) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Adv Sci (Weinh) (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41017533
- PMCID
- PMC12591202
- DOI
- 10.1002/advs.202510094
- Citations
- 3
Abstract (original English)
Magnetic particles (MPs), due to their unique physical and chemical properties, have emerged as promising tools in bone tissue engineering. Their incorporation into scaffolds or uptake by bone cells, combined with exposure to external magnetic fields, has been shown in various studies to enhance cell adhesion, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation. In this review, the state-of-the-art is presented on the synthesis processes of magnetized cells (MCs) and magnetized scaffolds (MSs), as well as the biological and mechanical effects of scaffold-free MCs, cell-seeded MSs, and MC-seeded MSs under externally applied magnetic fields on bone tissue engineering. Furthermore, the specific applications of these systems is highlighted, such as non-contact mechanical stimulation, and discuss their application to advance bone tissue engineering strategies.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.