Mapping the knowledge domains of literature on hepatocellular carcinoma and liver failure: a bibliometric approach
Pu J., Zhao Y., Zhang S., Wu T., Liu R., Yuan T.
Systematic Review, published in Front Oncol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Systematic Review
- Journal
- Front Oncol (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 40308492
- PMCID
- PMC12040667
- DOI
- 10.3389/fonc.2025.1529297
Abstract (original English)
Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 75-85% of primary liver cancers, with its incidence continually rising, posing a threat to socio-economic development. Currently, liver resection is the standard treatment for HCC. However, post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a severe and formidable postoperative complication that increases patients' medical expenses and mortality risk. Additionally, liver failure can occur at any stage of HCC development, severely affecting patients' quality of life and prognosis. Method Using the Web of Science Core Collection, this bibliometric study analyzed English articles and reviews on HCC and liver failure from 2003 to 2023. Bibliometric tools like CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and R-studio were employed for data visualization and analysis, focusing on publication trends, citation metrics, explosive intensity, and collaborative networks. Use the Comparative Toxicogenomics and Genecards databases to screen for genes related to liver failure, and perform enrichment analyses using Gene Ontology, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, and PubMed on the identified differentially expressed genes. Results The study identified a significant increase in publications on HCC and liver failure, with key contributions from journals such as the World Journal of Gastroenterology and the Journal of Hepatology. The United States, China, and Japan we
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.