Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMed

Mechanical and Enzymatic Digestion of Autologous Fat Grafting (A-FG): Fat Volume Maintenance and AD-SVFs Amount in Comparison.

Gentile P., Cervelli V., De Fazio D., Calabrese C., Scioli MG., Orlandi A.

Prospective Study with a reported sample of 20 on Face & Skin, published in Aesthetic Plast Surg (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Aesthetic Plast Surg (2023)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
20
Source database
PubMed
PMID
37130992
DOI
10.1007/s00266-023-03364-5
Citations
8

Abstract (original English)

Background Currently, several techniques for autologous fat graft (A-FG) preparation aimed at obtaining purified tissue exist. Both mechanical digestions via centrifugation, filtration, and enzymatic digestion were considered the most effective with different impacts in terms of adult adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction cells (AD-SVFs) amount that volume maintenance. Objectives This article aimed to report the in vivo and in vitro results, represented by fat volume maintenance and AD-SVFs amount, obtained by four different procedures of AD-SVFs isolation and A-FG purification based on centrifugation, filtration, centrifugation with filtration, and enzymatic digestion. Methods A prospective, case-control study was conducted. In total, 80 patients affected by face and breast soft tissue defects were treated with A-FG and divided into four groups: n=20 were treated with A-FG enhanced with AD-SVFs obtained by enzymatic digestion (study group 1 [SG-1]); n=20 were treated with A-FG enhanced with AD-SVFs obtained by centrifugation with filtration (SG-2); n=20 were treated with A-FG enhanced with AD-SVFs obtained by only filtration (SG-3); n=20 were treated with A-FG obtained by only centrifugation according to the Coleman technique (control group [CG]). Twelve months after the last A-FG session, the volume maintenance percentage was analyzed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
AdultHumansAdipose TissueCase-Control StudiesProspective StudiesBreastDigestion

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research