Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMedOpen access

Melt Electrowriting Combined with Fused Deposition Modeling Printing for the Fabrication of Three-Dimensional Biomimetic Scaffolds for Osteotendinous Junction Regeneration.

Ma S., Zheng S., Li D., Hu W., Wang L.

Laboratory Study on Tendon Injury, published in Int J Nanomedicine (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Int J Nanomedicine (2024)
Country
New Zealand
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
38601348
PMCID
PMC11005997
DOI
10.2147/IJN.S449952
Citations
6

Abstract (original English)

Purpose This study aims to explore a novel scaffold for osteotendinous junction regeneration and to preliminarily verify its osteogenic and tenogenic abilities in vitro. Methods A polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffold with aligned and orthogonal fibers was created using melt electrowriting (MEW) and fused deposition modeling (FDM). The scaffold was coated with Type I collagen, and hydroxyapatite was carefully added to separate the regions intended for bone and tendon regeneration, before being rolled into a cylindrical shape. Human adipose-derived stem cells (hADSCs) were seeded to evaluate viability and differentiation. Scaffold characterization was performed with Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Osteogenesis was assessed by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and Alizarin red staining, while immunostaining and transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) evaluated osteogenic and tendogenic markers. Results Scaffolds were developed in four variations: aligned (A), collagen-coated aligned (A+C), orthogonal (O), and mineral-coated orthogonal (O+M). SEM analysis confirmed surface morphology and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) verified mineral coating on O+M types. Hydrophilicity and mechanical properties were optimized in modified scaffolds, with A+C showing increased tensile strength and O+M improved in compression. hADSCs demonstrated good viability and morphol

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansTissue ScaffoldsBiomimeticsOsteogenesisPolyestersDurapatitePrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringCell DifferentiationBone Regeneration

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research