Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceMeta-analysisEurope PMCOpen access

Mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy for osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and functional recovery

Wang J., Xue H., Shi M., Chen R.

Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 811 on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceEvidence level of this study

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Meta-analysis
Journal
Front Cell Dev Biol (2025)
Reported sample size
811
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41567976
PMCID
PMC12816338
DOI
10.3389/fcell.2025.1746471
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Backgrounds This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy for osteoarthritis (OA) through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), focusing on patient-reported pain and functional outcomes. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to 1st October 2025. RCTs comparing intra-articular MSC injections with control interventions (placebo, hyaluronic acid, or other active treatments) in adult OA patients were included. Primary outcomes were changes in pain intensity measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and functional improvement assessed by International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. Secondary outcomes included Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lequesne index, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity scale. Data were pooled using random-effects models and expressed as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Eleven RCTs involving 811 patients were included. MSC therapy demonstrated significant reduction in VAS pain scores compared to controls (MD -4.08, 95% CI -5.56 to -2.61, p Conclusion Intra-articular MSC injection is an effective treatment for osteoarthritis, providing significant and durable improvements in pain

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research