Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMed

Mesenchymal stem cell therapies for ARDS: translational promise and challenges.

Wang F., Xie C., Wang X.

Clinical Trial on Chronic Inflammation, Immune Modulation, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Stem Cell Res Ther (2025)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41013838
DOI
10.1186/s13287-025-04614-w

Abstract (original English)

Over the past decade, global investigations have rigorously assessed the safety and therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in managing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). MSCs, obtained from sources like bone marrow, adipose tissue, and umbilical cord, exert therapeutic effects in ARDS primarily through complex paracrine mechanisms, including anti-inflammatory, immunoregulatory, pro-reparative, antioxidant, antimicrobial, and mitochondrial transfer functions. Preclinical studies have consistently demonstrated significant therapeutic benefits. Clinical trials have further confirmed a favorable safety profile, with no significant infusion-related toxicity or serious adverse events observed even at higher doses (up to 10 × 10⁶ cells/kg) or following multiple administrations. Yet, while some early-phase clinical trials have not conclusively demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality among ARDS patients, multiple studies note diminished inflammatory biomarkers, enhanced markers of endothelial and epithelial repair (e.g., angiopoietin-2), and suggestive benefits in subgroups like younger patients or those receiving higher doses of viable cells. MSC-derived therapies, particularly extracellular vesicles and conditioned medium, represent promising "cell-free" strategies that may overcome limitations associated with live-cell therapy. Despite encouraging p

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
HumansRespiratory Distress SyndromeMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsTranslational Research, BiomedicalClinical Trials as Topic

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research