Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsCase Report / SeriesEurope PMCOpen access

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria: Improvements in Arterial Stiffness and Bone Mineral Density in a Single Case

Joo EY., Park JS., Shin HT., Yoo M., Kim SJ., Lee JE.

Case Report / Series on Back & Spine, Systemic / IV, published in Children (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Case Report / Series
Journal
Children (Basel) (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40310235
PMCID
PMC12025413
DOI
10.3390/children12040523

Abstract (original English)

Background/objectives Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) is a rare genetic disorder that cause premature aging due to LMNA mutations and progerin accumulation. Although lonafarnib, an FDA-approved farnesyltransferase inhibitor, offers modest extension of life, the disease remains progressive. As progeria is associated with stem cell depletion and mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy has shown efficacy in treating atherosclerosis, we aimed to evaluate its efficacy and safety in HGPS. Methods A 7-year-old male with classic HGPS and preexisting severe cerebrovascular disease received four intravenous infusion of bone marrow-derived MSCs (2.5 × 10⁵ cells/kg) over 8 months. Growth, metabolic, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, auditory, and inflammatory cytokines were monitored throughout the study. Prophylactic enoxaparin was administered to prevent vascular complications. Results MSC therapy was associated with improved lean body mass (11.5%), bone mineral density (L-spine z-score: 0.55 → 2.03), reduced arterial stiffness (9.98% reductionin pulse wave velocity), joint range of motion, dentition, and decreased sICAM-1 levels. However, Cardiovascular deterioration continued, and the patient passed away 10 months after the fourth dose, likely due to progression of the underlying vascular disease. No severe adverse effects were attributed to MSC therapy. Conclusions MSC therapy

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research