Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMed

Mesenchymal stem cells in neurological disorders: Insights from clinical trials.

Araújo B., Serrenho I., Valente da Silva A., Marceta BM., Baltazar G.

Clinical Trial on Stroke Research, Spinal Cord Injury, Neuroinflammation, published in Regen Ther (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Regen Ther (2025)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41282495
DOI
10.1016/j.reth.2025.10.020

Abstract (original English)

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) exhibit unique properties that make them promising candidates for cell therapy, particularly in neurological disorders. They can be derived from various tissues, with bone marrow, adipose tissue, umbilical cord, and placenta being the most common sources. Evidence suggests that the tissue of origin significantly influences MSC characteristics, including secretome composition, proliferation rate, and adhesion capacity. Clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and therapeutic potential of MSCs in conditions such as spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, and stroke. MSC therapy has been associated with improvements in motor, sensory, and cognitive functions, as well as enhanced quality of life. Mechanistically, MSCs promote neuroprotection, reduce inflammation, and modulate immune responses. In spinal cord injury, intrathecal administration of adipose- and bone marrow-derived MSCs has led to significant functional recovery, with single high-dose treatments often yielding better outcomes than multiple lower doses. In amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, bone marrow-derived MSCs have shown potential in slowing disease progression, though higher doses do not always result in greater benefits. In multiple sclerosis, high doses of umbilical cord-derived MSCs improved quality of life and prevented disease progression, whereas lower doses of bone marrow-deriv

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research