Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Microencapsulation for Cell Therapy
Abbas SEM., Maged G., Wang H., Lotfy A.
Narrative Review, published in Cells (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Cells (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 39936941
- PMCID
- PMC11817150
- DOI
- 10.3390/cells14030149
- Citations
- 13
Abstract (original English)
Cell microencapsulation is one of the most studied strategies to overcome the challenges associated with the implementation of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) in vivo. This approach isolates/shields donor MSCs from the host immune system using a semipermeable membrane that allows for the diffusion of gases, nutrients, and therapeutics, but not host immune cells. As a result, microencapsulated MSCs survive and engraft better after infusion, and they can be delivered specifically to the targeted site. Additionally, microencapsulation enables the co-culture of MSCs with different types of cells in a three-dimensional (3D) environment, allowing for better cellular interaction. Alginate, collagen, and cellulose are the most popular materials, and air jet extrusion, microfluidics, and emulsion are the most used techniques for MSC cell encapsulation in the literature. These materials and techniques differ in the size range of the resultant microcapsules and their compatibility with the applied materials. This review discusses various materials and techniques used for the microencapsulation of MSCs. We also shed light on the recent findings in this field, the advantages and drawbacks of using encapsulated MSCs, and the in vivo translation of the microencapsulated MSCs in cell therapy.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.