Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Mesenchymal stromal/stem cell separation methods: concise review.

Nicodemou A., Danisovic L.

Narrative Review on Face & Skin, published in Cell Tissue Bank (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Cell Tissue Bank (2017)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
28821996
DOI
10.1007/s10561-017-9658-x

Abstract (original English)

Mesenchymal stem (stromal) cells (MSCs) possess unique biological characteristics such as plasticity, long term self-renewal, secretion of various bioactive molecules and ability of active migration to the diseased tissues that make them unique tool for regenerative medicine, nowadays. Until now MSCs were successfully derived from many tissue sources including bone marrow, umbilical cord, adipose tissue, dental pulp etc. The crucial step prior to their in vitro expansion, banking or potential clinical application is their separation. This review article aims to briefly describe the main MSCs separations techniques currently available, their basic principles, as well as their advantages and limits. In addition the attention is paid to the markers presently applicable for immunoaffinity-based separation of MSCs from different tissues and organs.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsBone Marrow CellsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsUmbilical Cord

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research