Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceMeta-analysisEurope PMCOpen access

Meta-Analysis of the Therapeutic Effects of Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Rodent Models of Hemorrhagic Stroke

Wang C., Yan B., Liao P., Chen F., Lei P.

Meta-analysis on Stroke Research, published in Stem Cells Int (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceEvidence level of this study

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Meta-analysis
Journal
Stem Cells Int (2024)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39263375
PMCID
PMC11390234
DOI
10.1155/2024/3390446
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Background Stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (SCEVs) have emerged as a potential therapy for hemorrhagic stroke. However, their effects are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the effects of SCEVs therapy in rodent models of hemorrhagic stroke, including subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Materials and methods We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science until May 2023 to identify studies investigating the effects of SCEVs therapy in rodent models of ICH. The functional outcomes were assessed using neurobehavioral scores. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Three authors independently screened the articles based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. All statistical analyses were performed using Revman 5.3 and Stata 17.0. Results Twelve studies published between 2018 and 2023 met the inclusion criteria. Our results showed that SCEVs therapy improved neurobehavioral scores in the rodent SAH model (SMD = -3.49, 95% CI: -4.23 to -2.75; p p =0.02) but did not have a significant impact on neurobehavioral scores in the acute and subacute phases. Significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies, and further stratification and sensitivity analyses failed to identify the source of heterogeneity. Con

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research