Methods to isolate adipose tissue-derived stem cells.
Ferroni L., De Francesco F., Pinton P., Gardin C., Zavan B.
Laboratory Study, published in Methods Cell Biol (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Methods Cell Biol (2022)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 35953202
- DOI
- 10.1016/bs.mcb.2022.04.011
- Citations
- 12
Abstract (original English)
The use of adipose tissue has seen increasing interest in recent years for treating plastic surgery defects and for regenerative medicine applications. Adipose tissue is considered an optimal source of stem cells, as it contains more multipotent cells than bone marrow for the same volume. The adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ADSCs), isolated from the heterogeneous stromal vascular fraction (SVF), possess self-renewal properties and multilineage differentiation potential. In addition, adipose tissue can be obtained with less invasive procedures and patient morbidity than other tissue. For these reasons, numerous enzymatic, and non-enzymatic isolation methods have been developed over the years. The traditional method for isolation and culture of primary ADSCs from adipose tissue relies on enzymatic digestion with collagenase, followed by multiple steps of centrifugation. Alternative non-enzymatic isolation methods are based closed, sterile, and safe isolation processes that differ from each other for parameters such as the centrifugation force, pressure, filtration, and washing. Despite the existence of this multitude of systems, the best isolation method has not been identified to date. Therefore, the great challenge remains the achievement of the standardization of cellular products to allow the comparability between clinical studies and trials.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.