Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMed

Microenvironmental Changes in the Surviving Fat 1 Year After Autologous Fat Transplantation for Breast Augmentation.

Li FW., Zeng L., Luo SK.

Prospective Study with a reported sample of 5, published in Aesthet Surg J (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Aesthet Surg J (2021)
Country
England
Reported sample size
5
Source database
PubMed
PMID
32504528
DOI
10.1093/asj/sjaa156

Abstract (original English)

Autologous fat is currently one of the most commonly used soft tissue materials in plastic surgery, but the changes that occur in fat after transplantation are unclear. Existing studies on the changes in surviving fat mostly involve animal experiments. The aim of this study was to obtain surviving fat 1 year after clinical autologous fat transplantation for breast augmentation, to explain the microenvironmental changes after fat transplantation from a clinical perspective, and to verify previous research conclusions, thus providing new insight into fat survival. Samples of surviving fat were obtained from 5 patients 1 year after they had undergone autologous fat transplantation for breast augmentation, and normal fat samples were obtained from 5 patients who had not undergone this procedure. The differences between CD68 and CD31 were analyzed immunohistochemically, and between CD34 and Ki67 by immunofluorescence. We also tested whether UCP-1 is expressed in surviving fat. The relative CD68, CD34, and Ki67 expression levels in the surviving fat tissue were significantly higher than those in the normal fat tissue (PCD68 = 0.04, PCD34 = 0.03, PKi67 = 0.02). The relative CD31 expression was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.52). No UCP-1 expression was observed in any surviving fat tissue. Chronic inflammatory reactions mediated by macrophages were detectabl

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsHumansMammaplastyMesenchymal Stem CellsPostoperative ComplicationsTransplantation, Autologous

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.