Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Microfluidics for cell therapy and manufacturing in oncology and regenerative medicine

Duncan JL., Arroyo JP., Davalos RV.

Narrative Review on Face & Skin, Hip, Ankle & Foot, published in Lab Chip (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Lab Chip (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41498563
PMCID
PMC12777651
DOI
10.1039/d5lc00492f
Citations
3

Abstract (original English)

Microfluidics has offered invaluable insight into diagnostics and point-of-care applications due to its small footprint, low costs, and minimal power requirements. As cellular manufacturing has shown significant promise for treating previously insurmountable diseases, microfluidics has expanded its reach into immunotherapy and regenerative medicine with a clinical perspective. Conventional methods to reprogram a target cell to improve prognosis, while innovative on their own, face challenges that miniaturized systems are poised to address. Here, we provide an overview of microfluidic-based technology that highlights significant strides within the field of cell manufacturing to treat cancer and degenerative diseases. We highlight commonly used mechanisms to isolate, transfect, and expand target cells in microfluidic devices. We discuss specific innovative microfluidic-based approaches that demonstrate comparable or exceptional performance compared to traditional methods.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHumansNeoplasmsMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesRegenerative MedicineLab-On-A-Chip DevicesCell- and Tissue-Based Therapy

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research