Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Microfracture and Microfracture Plus of the Knee Joint.

Bumberger A., Homere AJ., Smith RD., Lattermann C.

Narrative Review on Cartilage Damage, published in Clin Sports Med (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Clin Sports Med (2024)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
40514152
DOI
10.1016/j.csm.2024.10.003

Abstract (original English)

Microfracture (MF) treats small full-thickness cartilage defects in the knee by creating subchondral bone perforations to stimulate cartilage regeneration. Despite its popularity, MF produces fibrocartilage with inferior properties to native hyaline cartilage, leading to midterm clinical deterioration. Microfracture plus (MFplus) aims to enhance outcomes by integrating scaffolds and orthobiologics. This scoping review evaluates MF and MFplus, focusing on clinical, MRI, and histologic outcomes. Techniques examined include MF with porcine collagen membranes, hyaluronic acid-based matrices, and orthobiologics like platelet-rich plasma, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, and adipose tissue-derived stromal cells.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansArthroplasty, SubchondralCartilage, ArticularKnee InjuriesKnee JointPlatelet-Rich PlasmaTissue ScaffoldsMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research