Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Minimally invasive options in Dupuytren's contracture: aponeurotomy, enzymes, stretching, and fat grafting.

Murphy A., Lalonde DH., Eaton C., Denkler K., Hovius SER., Smith AA.

Narrative Review, published in Plast Reconstr Surg (2014) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Plast Reconstr Surg (2014)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
25347658
DOI
10.1097/PRS.0000000000000603

Abstract (original English)

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: (1) Perform needle aponeurotomy, fat grafting, Digit Widget insertion, and collagenase injection for Dupuytren's cords. (2) Describe how cords can be stretched without surgery. (3) Explain to patients the risks and benefits of these new alternatives of treatments. Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture used to be the only alternative of treatment. The past 5 years have seen the widespread adoption of minimally invasive treatments in the form of needle aponeurotomy and collagenase injection to disrupt the cords and restore range of motion. Even newer and perhaps as effective treatments such as fat grafting and mechanical stretching with the Digit Widget may also end up being important tools of treatment. The reader will be introduced to all of these modalities with text, illustration, and videos.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueCollagenasesDupuytren ContractureExercise TherapyFasciotomyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMuscle Stretching Exercises

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.