Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceSystematic ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Modern Conservative Management Strategies for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review

Petca A., Fotă A., Petca RC., Rotar IC.

Systematic Review, published in J Clin Med (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceEvidence level of this study

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Systematic Review
Journal
J Clin Med (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40429264
PMCID
PMC12112232
DOI
10.3390/jcm14103268
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is characterized by the involuntary leakage of urine during activities that increase intra-abdominal pressure. The management of SUI encompasses surgical treatments, such as colposuspension and sling procedures, and nonsurgical ones that involve pelvic floor muscle treatment, behavioral therapies, as well as pharmacological interventions. By exploring nonsurgical options initially, individuals have the opportunity to address the root causes of stress urinary incontinence and strengthen pelvic floor muscles. Background/Objectives : This article delves into the conservative measures in managing SUI among women and the options of minimally invasive strategies for SUI, such as the injection of platelet-rich plasma, stem cells, bulking agents, and laser and radiofrequency therapy. Methods : A search of the literature from 2010 until January 2024 was carried out on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science research databases. Results : A total of 34 studies on human females assessing the roles of platelet-rich plasma, laser and radiofrequency therapy, bulking agents, and stem cell therapy were included. Conclusions : The shortcoming of most conservative techniques seems to be represented by the temporary effects and the necessity of repeated treatments. To establish effective medical techniques, adopting more standardized procedures and conducting

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.