Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Modern techniques in addressing facial acne scars: A thorough analysis

Miao L., Ma Y., Liu Z., Ruan H., Yuan B.

Narrative Review on Scar, published in Skin Res Technol (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Skin Res Technol (2024)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
38303407
PMCID
PMC10835023
DOI
10.1111/srt.13573
Citations
15

Abstract (original English)

Background Facial acne scars are a prevalent concern, leading to the development of various treatment modalities. Objectives This review aims to explore the latest advancements in the treatment of facial acne scars, focusing on both surgical and non-surgical methods. Methods The non-surgical treatments reviewed include topical medications (such as retinoids and alpha hydroxy acids) and non-invasive procedures (like microdermabrasion and chemical peels). Surgical options discussed are punch excision, subcision, and fractional laser treatments. Results Combination therapy, integrating both surgical and non-surgical approaches, is frequently utilized to achieve optimal results in scar improvement. Conclusion Recent advancements in the treatment of facial acne scars provide promising options for individuals seeking improvement. However, these treatments have associated risks and potential adverse effects, highlighting the importance of consulting a dermatologist before beginning any treatment regimen.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
CicatrixHumansAcne VulgarisRetinoidsTreatment OutcomeChemexfoliationDermabrasion

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research